Saturday, March 12, 2016

Tool #6—Google Docs (Cheryl Hallowell)


Tool #6—Google Docs
Cheryl Hallowell
    
Google Docs (www.google.com/docs) is a web-based application that can be accessed by anyone with a Google account and be accessed on multiple devices. It is a word processing, spreadsheet, and presentation tool compatible with many others programs (like Microsoft Office products). Our school is a GAFE school, and each student has an email address assigned by the district. I have not incorporated Goggle Docs in my classroom…yet. I never considered it before this class, but now I think that I will try. Students will be using the application in third grade. If I introduce it, I think the third grade teachers might want to send me chocolate for thanks, since introducing this application will relieve them of some of the heavy work next year (and I love chocolate!).
Features:
·      Easy to use after the initial training.
·      Free!
·      Students can work on projects from home and school.
·      Created documents can be shared.
·      Students with more capabilities or extra support can learn to do more and more with the many features.
Classroom Application:
·      Students can share their work digitally.
·      Students can get feedback from the teachers and, when appropriate, from others that the work is shared with.
·      Students can improve writing by editing their work easily and resubmitting, thus really hitting the PBE premise.
·      Students can have increased pride in work.
·      Students can collaborate with peers (even from other rooms/schools) on projects.
Ranking:
·      Safety—4 The teacher is in charge of what student data is available.
·      Student Enjoyability—3/4 Students will enjoy this program depending on what the assignment is and the level of rigor they put in. The potential is certainly a 4.
·      Accessibility—4 Google Docs can be used on many devices and is free.
·      Feedback—4 There is potential for meaningful feedback from teachers and others who have shared the documents.
·      Higher Level Thinking—4 The level of taxonomy is dependent upon the project that the students are working on.

Team 2 Early Elementary Rubric Applied to Goggle Docs



Does Not Meet the Expectations
1

Partially Meets the Expectations
2

Meets the Expectations
3

Exceeds the Expectations
4


Safety
*Student data can be readily accessed by anyone.
*Students can receive or send messages to while using the tool.
*Tool has ads or pop-ups.
*Student data cannot be easily accessed by others.
*Students can send or receive message to others in the district while using tool.
*Tool has ads or pop-ups.
*Student data is not accessible to outside individuals.
*Students cannot receive or send messages while using the tool.
*Tool has no ads or pop-ups.
*Student data (beyond first name and grade level) is not needed to use the tool.
*Student data can only be accessed by invited individuals.
*Tool has no ads or pop-ups.


Student
Enjoyability
*Students are not motivated and engaged by this technology tool.
*Poor graphics, poor entertainment value and the tool is not user friendly
*Students are motivated and engaged by parts of this technology tool.
*O.K. graphics, some parts are entertaining and some parts are user friendly
*Students will be motivated and engaged to use this technology tool.
*Great graphics, entertaining and user friendly
*Students will be highly motivated and engaged to use this technology tool.
*Above and beyond graphics, entertaining and extremely user friendly


Accessibility
*Tool is likely to crash or close without warning.
*Students are unable to find the tool without assistance.
*Tool costs money to use.
*Students need assistance accessing tool (user name/password long or confusing).
*Students need assistance following the directions for using the tool.
*Tool is low cost or free.
*After appropriate instruction, students can access the tool independently.
*Students can use the tool with little to no adult assistance.
*Tool is free or low cost.
*Students can use the tool (app, site, or program) on different devices both at home and at school.
*Tool is free or low cost.

Feedback
(When Applicable)
*No feedback given.
*No ability for teachers or peers to leave feedback.
*Irrelevant feedback given.
*Limited ability for teachers or peers to leave feedback.
*Meaningful feedback available.
*Ability for teachers and peers to leave feedback.
*Meaningful feedback available along with links to lessons/exercises to practice weak areas.
*Ability for teachers and peers feedback.

Higher Level Thinking
*Communication tool has no clear goal that encourages students to use any of Bloom's skills beyond the first level (remember).                
*Communication tool has a goal that encourages students to use at least one of Bloom's skills (remember and understand).                          
*Communication tool has specific goal and one or more supporting objectives that encourage students to use many of Bloom's skills, including evaluate and analyze).  
*Communication tool has clearly defined goals and several supporting objectives that encourage students to use many of Bloom's skills, including create.      

No comments:

Post a Comment