Socrative Review

Features:  Socrative is a platform teachers can use to assess student understanding of content quickly, and then be able to respond to that information immediately.  Quizzes can be quickly created and uploaded, and short check-ins can also be done with immediate feedback for the teacher.  Students need to have their own device to participate in the quizzes, but Socrative is available on laptops in all browsers, as well as in app form for Android and iOS devices, so handheld devices can be used but are not required.  Students get immediate feedback during the quizzes because the answer will turn green if it is correct, and red if incorrect, which is valuable in itself.  Assessments can be printed out as a record of progress or to share with parents.

Classroom Use:  I am reviewing this tool with a K-2 class in mind, and for that reason there may be limits to the amount of classroom use one would want to get out of this tool.  If quizzes can be created with picture clues then I may use this for some basic math (geometry) and maybe letter id checks, but lengthier questions and quizzes would not be appropriate at that level.  In and older elementary class, I think this would be very useful on a daily basis, especially in math and the content areas.

Ranking:  Socrative earned a score of 25/30, would makes this an acceptable platform to use, but not one of high priority.

	Ineffective OH NO! (1pts)	Adequate It’s OK (2pts)	Must Use Sign me up! (3pts)
Learning Target Goal	Students are unable to use this tool to meet their learning target	Students can see how this tool can be used to meet their learning target	Tool is transparent and students can clearly see how this tool is used and can apply it to their learning
User-Friendly Design	Students have a hard time navigating through the tool and can not easily find what they need	Students can navigate through the tool but have difficulty finding useful tools	Students can easily navigate through tool
Access (Free or Paid)	Communication tool is too expensive and not worth the benefit of the tool and/or is not accessible to students and teachers	Communication tool requires small monthly fee that is worth the use and benefit of the tool and/or easily accessible to students and teachers	Communication tool is free and/or easily accessible to students and teachers
Differentiation	There is no way to accommodate or differentiate for all learners	This tool could be differentiated for a few types of learners	There are many ways this tool could be adapted for all learners
Student Motivation	Students are not/would not be motivated to interact using this tool	Some/few students may be  interested in using this tool	Students are excited to use this tool to interact and communicate
Timely Communication/ Feedback	Communication stream is not easily followed and takes too much practice to learn to be useful	Communication stream may be difficult to follow and manage, or managing feedback is not easily done in a timely manner	Communication stream is easy to follow and access quickly to keep feedback timely
Trackable User Work Record	Student work is not archived or able to be tracked.  There is no way to easily see what each member has contributed.	Student work may be archived OR individual student contributions may be determined	Student work is easily tracked and individual contributions are clearly and easily determined.
Medium	Tool is only available for one or two browser platforms	Tool is available in some browsers and/or devices	Tool is easily used on multiple or all available browsers, mobile devices, and computers
Age Appropriate	Tool is not appropriate for the target age group, either too simplified or too complex	Tool may need to be adapted to fit the target age group	Tool is appropriate for the target age group
Monitoring Capability	Teacher has no means to monitor and remove inappropriate content or comment	Teacher may not be able to monitor, or may not be able to remove inappropriate content	Teacher is easily able to monitor user interaction for appropriateness